and so it goes..
my boring life...yeah i don't know how others lead theirs, but i fear my life must seem terribly boring to many other pple...yeah i know its the exams, and exams make life dull sometimes, but oh well who cares what other pple think right? More important to have some self confidence that'll go a long way. What matters is i find what i do challenging and interesting!
spent lotsa time last night and today adding a few features to this blog, most visible being the floating links bar to the left. Well been looking at many other blogs, so interesting-looking, but mine's still a default template, though subject to some tweaking to accomodate that javascript...boy that was tough trying to make the menu float! and the mending procedures following that too!! also, i can add post notes like these * ! Yay! it works! Hopefully this comes in useful for technical articles in future!
Note: | (hide) |
Note: | (hide) |
Talking about looking at other blogs, hehe reveals my "voyeuristic tendencies". Yeah its interesting looking at what other people are posting. Like girls talking abt their boyfriends and such...haha! oops! But i'm also glad i came across some other blogs such as iraquna.blogspot.com at last i've seen the famous blog written by an iraqi as seen on the papers! I've got lots to discover in the blogger's world! *wink*
And now, for some more "random ramblings on physics for possible future use":
What sort of geometry could we be talking abt with space?
Does only "space" need to have a topology?
How abt energy too? Cycles...yin/yang...symmetry in topology, how abt topology of physical laws? Topology of a topology? Russian dolls with symmetry, i.e. the "largest" doll fits into the "smallest" one?
Laws and laws which govern laws...sets of laws applying to only particular universes...compare with eignfunctions of the schroedinger equation, and Hawking's wavefunction of the universe
Constants? Physical constants? Hmm...
why does quantum mechanics have the Planck's constant?
Some commonly made assumptions:
energy is conserved
there is a fundamental particle
existence of the Planck energy/distance/whatever else
why does the "single unified force" at higher energies have to split into 4 forces at our energy? Only 4 forces?
so much for wild questioning...perhaps they may be useful years later haha! well, if not for physics, at least to entertain the masses abt my stupidity??!
yep tt's all.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home